I have developed a real love for the genre. It might be my current favorite, and in fact, I think I read more YA fiction than any other genre in the past two years or so. While there have been some really great books, like
On the Jellicoe Road,
How to Save a Life,
Before I Fall and
The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau-Banks, I have read some things that I just did not love very much. Here are the things that I'm discovering about YA books that don't quite hit the mark.
1. Plagiarism... The story is some other author's story. Now it's true that all stories are just recycled versions of something that was written long before.
But...there is a difference between using general ideas and taking an entire plot outline and changing the names and the locations and then calling it one's own. It seems like a lot of authors have jumped on the
Twilight Saga bandwagon, for example, but I'm pretty sure that once Meyer tapped into that market, it was over. I guess what I find most annoying about this is that it lacks creative merit. I suppose if you can tell a new story about a supernatural boyfriend and his mortal girlfriend, you should make a go of it. I, however, am extremely skeptical.
Lesson, write your own book. If you can write an entire novel, you can write your own story.
2. The Dreaded Love Triangle... There are certain tropes in literature that are tough to pull off in a compelling way, and the love triangle is one of them, especially if it is a focal point of the story. The more it gets used, the harder it is to make the romantic tension feel any different from the other stories already out there. And right now, it's tired tired tired. I even have to call out Sara Zarr. As much as I loved
How to Save a Life, she was getting dangerously close to ruining the story with the love triangle; fortunately, she didn't cross over the line. What's more...and probably worse? A poorly executed love triangle forces the idea that the more a girl is wanted by the boys around her, the more valuable she is. At least, in most of the books I've read, it seems that was the message being sent. I find that difficult to swallow. Woman are more than objects to be desired whose value is directly in proportion to her desirability. I would think that in a modern age, we'd have come a lot farther than this. It isn't a message I would want to send to my child.
I think it is a mistake to use it. Period. For the next thirty years.
3. Overtly sexual behavior... There seems to be a push to make the stories "sexy". I find this to be frustrating for more than one reason. First, it's pandering to what authors think the YA audience wants. Young adults are just that - YOUNG. And generally speaking, they like the sweet stories about crushes and and a good kiss. Second, overly sexual books are masking other problems. I think authors use it to hide under-developed characters, or to mask sub par writing, or to hide the story's lack of direction or depth.
Wake is the perfect example of this. The sexiness was used to bamboozle the reader. Fact is, the story and the characters were not up to snuff.
Before I Fall pushed the line, and I admit that it probably crossed it. However, I also think that book is more for adults, or at least much older teens, and then the sexual content was used to develop the characters and their rotten behavior. In any case, it wasn't a blanket endorsement of such behavior.
Wake was. Call me old fashioned, but we should not be endorsing sexual behavior to teenage girls. Period.
Bottom line - young adult readers care more about the thrill of the crush, the excitement of the first kiss.
4. Language... Speaking of sexual content, the language is also a problem. The best YA novels I've read lately have used it minimally or not at all. I think such language is distracting, and again, it's just a ruse to hide poor writing, plotting, character development. I also think it's a way to pander to an audience.
Oh, and death to the F word. Hate it!
5. All fluff no substance... The cover is beautiful. But the story is severely lacking. Everyone in the story is a super-model/athlete/movie star. But the characters are dull and boring. It takes more than a pretty character to make a book work. Same with the cover. I wish authors would take more time editing (and maybe that editors would actually edit).
Pretty covers are nice, but I'd take a poorly executed cover with a good story any day.
6. And last, my least fave thing ever, telling and not showing... I think this is a lazy way to tell a story. Every good story lets its reader inside of the action. Think
The Hunger Games. You are watching Katniss
do something (at least in books one and two). Regardless, stories like
Clockwork Angel could be awesome, but Clare kept telling us what happened instead of giving us some action. ACTION!!! It's sort of boring when a character goes on about what happened in the past, especially when what happened could have been a really great scene. It's probably harder, I admit, to create the scene, though. Still, if Clare (and others like her), ever wants her work to stand up next to
Finnikin of the Rock, she's going to have to make the effort.
SHOW SHOW SHOW...ACTION ACTION ACTION. The end.